City Voters Approve Lowering Council Age Limit
A small majority the voters of Guthrie have said that City Councilmen should be able to hold office at the age of 21.
GUTHRIE - All of the votes are in. With a small majority the voters of Guthrie have said that City Councilmen should be able to hold office at the age of 21. In a close 179 to 155 decision voters approved changing the City Charter to allow for the lowering of this age requirement from 25 to 21. A majority of citizens voted Yes in 10 out of 14 precincts and in the absentee balloting.
Voters also easily approved the question on the ballot that allowed the city government to operate on an Oct 1-Sept 30 fiscal year. This question was approved in 13 of the 14 precincts and in the absentee balloting.
A question which clarified some of the language in the Charter was approved 286-51.
It appears that while a majority of the public did support all three Charter amendments opposition was felt to all three in two Ward 1 precincts. Precincts 102 (Highland Hall) and 307 (First Christian Church) defeated the age change proposition and registered above average opposition to the other two purposed changes.
The only other two precincts to defeat the age change were precincts 309 (West Noble Avenue) and 104 (Harmony Community). Precinct 104 had the unique distinction of being the only precinct defeating both propositions. However it should be noted that only two people voted at this location.
Items of note included:
- 40% of the voters who voted in the April 99 General Municipal Elections voted in this election.
- Ward II Councilor Randy Foster was the leading advocate of the change in the fiscal year. Ward II voters supported Mr. Fosters proposition 93-13.
- Ward III Councilor Grant Aguirre was the primary advocate on council of the age change requirement. Ward III voters agreed with Grant by supporting the age change 42-37.
- Ward I was the only ward to defeat a proposal. By a vote of 81-77 the ward voted not to allow the age requirement to change.
Proposition 1 -Clearing Up Ballot Language in Charter
Precinct 102
62 Yes
8 No
Precinct 103
12 Yes
3 No
Precinct 104
1 Yes
1 No
Precinct 204
21 Yes
2 No
Precinct 206
26 Yes
4 No
Precinct 307
54 Yes
12 No
Precinct 308
41 Yes
9 No
Precinct 309
22 Yes
5 No
Precinct 310
13 Yes
3 No
Absentee
34 Yes
4 No
Total: 286-51
Proposition 2 - Allowing the change of the city fiscal year.
Precinct 102
58 Yes
11 No
Precinct 103
11 Yes
3 No
Precinct 104
0 Yes
2 No
Precinct 204
19 Yes
2 No
Precinct 206
24 Yes
5 No
Precinct 307
51 Yes
13 No
Precinct 308
38 Yes
9 No
Precinct 309
21 Yes
5 No
Precinct 310
11 Yes
7 No
Absentee
31 Yes
7 No
Total 264-62
Proposition 3 - Supporting the change in council age requirement.
Precinct 102
32 Yes
38 No
Precinct 103
8 Yes
7 No
Precinct 104
0 Yes
2 No
Precinct 204
19 Yes
4 No
Precinct 206
17 Yes
13 No
Precinct 307
26 Yes
39 No
Precinct 308
31 Yes
19 No
Precinct 309
11 Yes
16 No
Precinct 310
8 Yes
7 No
Absentee
27 Yes
10 No
Total: 179-155
Comments
Comments Not Yet Enabled
Comments have not yet been enabled for this article. Check back later for updates.
Add a Comment